Tool Talk
Wrench Forum => Wrench Forum => Topic started by: Branson on April 19, 2013, 08:11:10 AM
-
But Oily, do you have a "primative old vintage Thorsen?"
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Primative-old-vintage-Thorsen-Double-Box-End-Wrench-7-16-3-8-1612-/200916673101?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2ec791224d
-
I guess its lackluster finish qualifies it as primitive ?
-
Primative, (sic) conjures up an image of Boyd and Mortensen, wearing bearskin coats, standing in front of fire, beating out wrenches on a rock with a club.
-
It has an almost vintage Plomb look to it.
-
I saw it this morning in my routine Internet sweep. Based on the model number and stampings I'd say it's late 1920's to early 1930s. I'm in for it so long as the price doesn't get silly. Silly is a relative term in that context :)
-
Well, what do you date that catalog you bought as? 30/31? It's got chevy six (29) stuff but not Ford V8 (32) yet is that right? The Boeing aeronautical school mentioned was founded in 29. so it has to be after that. Also, does it mention the "techniheat" process? That was in April of 31 so it may or may not have been mentioned in a 31 cat. depending on publication month. If it's not mentioned that puts the catalog to pre April 1931. My guess is your cat. is probably a 31 and the 31 referred to on the AA website is a 32. I concur with the idea that Thorsen didn't start til 29. I believe that Ned Boyd went with the 26 date because HE personally had been supplying "fine mechanics hand tools since 1926". When did Thorsen make a flat shank 16XX series wrench? I know General Tool sold some 16XX series wrenches they contracted from Thorsen for awhile but they weren't using Thorsen til after 1931. If that wrench isn't in your catalog and I don't think it is we can probably rule out late 20's and at least a couple years into the 30's. I would just say that at some point where they still had their original 10XX round shank box ends and hadn't transitioned to their flat shank 10XX box ends and needed a a new series number for the "new" flat shanks EXCEPT there's clearly a round shank 16XX ( and it's an offset!) on the AA website that looks like a 9XX but with markings that look more modern than the classic mid 30's OAK, CALIF marked ones. So.....I don't think I solved anything and without my catalogs I'm probably forgetting something obvious but I'm thinking it's later than late 20's and early 30's.....
-
Primative, (sic) conjures up an image of Boyd and Mortensen, wearing bearskin coats, standing in front of fire, beating out wrenches on a rock with a club.
Probably means only primates could use it. Whether these are ape primates or church primates isn't indicated.
-
Well, what do you date that catalog you bought as? 30/31? It's got chevy six (29) stuff but not Ford V8 (32) yet is that right? The Boeing aeronautical school mentioned was founded in 29. so it has to be after that. Also, does it mention the "techniheat" process? That was in April of 31 so it may or may not have been mentioned in a 31 cat. depending on publication month. If it's not mentioned that puts the catalog to pre April 1931. My guess is your cat. is probably a 31 and the 31 referred to on the AA website is a 32.
It depends on which catalog you speak of. I have one purchased off Ebay last December that is early 30s. I would date the catalog 1931 or 1932, but as of yet there is no clear evidence of it's exact date.
The 1600 Series, as represented in the early 30's catalog I have, are speed wrenches. The model 1612 would have represented a 3/8" opening on a 8" below bend speed wrench.
I rarely leverage AA for my research, and it's been a good while since I've read the Thorsen write-up there. I should probably do that again soon.
My approach is to have the wrench in my hand for further research.
Its good to see other's interested in, and knowledgeable of, Thorsen.
-
It depends on which catalog you speak of. I have one purchased off Ebay last December that is early 30s. I would date the catalog 1931 or 1932, but as of yet there is no clear evidence of it's exact date.
I rarely leverage AA for my research, and it's been a good while since I've read the Thorsen write-up there. I should probably do that again soon.
My approach is to have the wrench in my hand for further research.
UUhhhhhh, yes,... that catalog, the one you posted a link to in a previous post.
Hopefully the fact that I had a slight difference of opinion about the possible date of the tool didn't put you on the defensive. I notice you didn't address any of the points I tried to use to begin building a case for dating the tool. Instead of waiting for someone To pull out a 1935 or a war years catalog with that exact tool in it I thought it would be interesting to try and work it out with what evidence we have or could get from the board members now. The pictures of the wrench were pretty clear in the auction, when you talk about having the wrench in your hands for further research what kinds of things would you look for? I guess if there was evidence of chrome that had been stripped off or traces of a cadmium finish, those might be good clues but what else?
Your comment about rarely leveraging AA for research is interesting. If your only interest is Thorsen, then yes, you could read it once and take whatever, if anything, is useful. As a general statement....I don't know...why wouldn't you?
-
It depends on which catalog you speak of. I have one purchased off Ebay last December that is early 30s. I would date the catalog 1931 or 1932, but as of yet there is no clear evidence of it's exact date.
I rarely leverage AA for my research, and it's been a good while since I've read the Thorsen write-up there. I should probably do that again soon.
My approach is to have the wrench in my hand for further research.
UUhhhhhh, yes,... that catalog, the one you posted a link to in a previous post.
Hopefully the fact that I had a slight difference of opinion about the possible date of the tool didn't put you on the defensive. I notice you didn't address any of the points I tried to use to begin building a case for dating the tool. Instead of waiting for someone To pull out a 1935 or a war years catalog with that exact tool in it I thought it would be interesting to try and work it out with what evidence we have or could get from the board members now. The pictures of the wrench were pretty clear in the auction, when you talk about having the wrench in your hands for further research what kinds of things would you look for? I guess if there was evidence of chrome that had been stripped off or traces of a cadmium finish, those might be good clues but what else?
Your comment about rarely leveraging AA for research is interesting. If your only interest is Thorsen, then yes, you could read it once and take whatever, if anything, is useful. As a general statement....I don't know...why wouldn't you?
There are a lot of things I enjoy in life. This thread isn't one of them. I do appreciate the "heads-up' from Branson.
-
Wow!! OK, I got your number now. I'll refrain from commenting directly to any more of your posts.
-
Thanks for the Thorsen information guys.
I can't seem to find a reason for your little spat, but thanks again for the info.
-
Wow!! OK, I got your number now. I'll refrain from commenting directly to any more of your posts.
No mistaking this hostility, take my number as well, thanks
-
Hi, thanks Ernie. If any adults want to PM me about Thorsen or P&C or Plomb or other old tool companies, I'd be happy to share anything I know or bounce around some ideas(as an equal contributor) Apparently ( based on other threads with the same players) I stepped into a little community that has a hierarchy where one guy does a show and tell of his acquisitions and everybody else ooohs and aaahs. I didn't post to show anyone up or take their crown. If I worded something wrong or had a tone, or was abrasive or otherwise inappropriate for the forum I apologize but I honestly don't believe that's the issue here.
-
You're welcome, Oily. I thought of you when I saw this one come up. Let's hope the bidding doesn't get silly, and that you get the wrench in your hand!
-
The trouble with email posts is that we each "hear" the words differently, and sometimes the "voice" we hear in our heads is different from the voice the writer meant. Me, I give the writer the benefit of the doubt. Life's easier this way. I prefer to think all of us mean things friendly (unless proven otherwise).
Oily, by the way, is our resident Thorsen major (!) collector. I understand why he wouldn't find much on AA that he didn't already know (and have duplicates of).
Let's get back to the tools we all enjoy.