News:

"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." - Robert Hughes

Main Menu

Rush Piston Ring Extractor

Started by Papaw, May 18, 2014, 08:52:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Papaw

Another estate sale find was at first a What's-it, but I had guessed correctly. It is a piston ring extractor from 1917.




Member of PHARTS - Perfect Handle Admiration, Restoration and Torturing Society
 
Flickr page- https://www.flickr.com/photos/nhankamer/

amecks

That just looks like a neat design.  It seems like it might be easier to use than the pliers type. 
Al.
Al
Jordan, NY

Plyerman

That one actually looks like it might have been useful. Wonder why it never caught on?
My friends call me Bob. My wife calls me a lot worse.

Bill Houghton

Man, that looks so much more comfortable than gripping the ends of the rings with your thumbnails and prying while the sharp ends of the rings attempt to penetrate the nail bed.

I'd be a little concerned with that design about the offset between the two "fingers" leading to the ring being twisted as it's opened.  But maybe the ring gets captured in the groove so that it's not an issue.

Lostmind

Actually , it may keep the rings from twisting. Most of the ones I use twist the ring as it spreads , usually just as you get to the point where it's ready to clear the piston. Maybe the offset counter acts the twisting?
I usually just use my fingers , but some oil rings require the tool.
Of all the things I've lost , I miss my mind the most

Papaw

I suspect it didn't catch on because (in my experience) rings seemed to almost always be stuck in the ring lands on teardown, and I don't see the prongs fitting in the end gap. Now for installing rings, I see it working well, expanding the new ring to fit over the piston and sliding down to set the ring in the ring land without tearing up fingers and scratching the piston sides.
Member of PHARTS - Perfect Handle Admiration, Restoration and Torturing Society
 
Flickr page- https://www.flickr.com/photos/nhankamer/

humber2

The Ford Model T engine's bore was 3 3⁄4 inches.

Is that a match?

Papaw

Just guessing from the radius of the tool, it is near 3 1/2". Don't see why it wouldn't work on larger and smaller.
Member of PHARTS - Perfect Handle Admiration, Restoration and Torturing Society
 
Flickr page- https://www.flickr.com/photos/nhankamer/

JoeCB

The off set fingers would be for the old style step gap rings. These rings were 5/16 to 1/4 wide and often had step gaps. I just encountered a situation on a old engine (1916 vintage) that had these rings and my "modern" ring expander did twist the rings because of the purchase on the ends of the steps. I sure could have used that tool !

Joe B

mvwcnews

Thanks for the patent -- I've had one of these laying around for years & was never motivated to look it up. 

Papaw

Member of PHARTS - Perfect Handle Admiration, Restoration and Torturing Society
 
Flickr page- https://www.flickr.com/photos/nhankamer/